Clarifying the Task to Support Student Learning
The Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) framework outlines three key components: purpose, task, and criteria; we have created resources for each one. This framework is founded on making the goal and expectations—as well as the process of completing the assignment—more explicit to students.
The task aspect of transparent assignment design is identifying what steps the students should take to complete the assignment or activity. Through communicating the task component, the instructor provides a roadmap to help the students either follow the steps or identify them. The explanation of the tasks can also leave opportunities for student discovery when that is part of the purpose of the assignment. It’s an understandable concern that (re)designing transparent assignments may take too much faculty time. That said, research shows the payoff of this process was substantial, as it resulted in “reduced confusion and improved performance from students, and ultimately saving time in the end for both students and instructors” (Boye et al., 2019, p. 63).
Why is sharing the task important?
Transparent communication about the task supports students’ metacognitive awareness, engagement, persistence, and self-efficacy by helping them better understand how and what they are learning throughout the process (Winkelmes, 2023; Bandura, 1997). Research indicates that when students clearly understand the task, they tend to produce work of higher quality and often meet instructional goals more efficiently – allowing time for deeper engagement with more complex material and leading to greater achievement by the end of the term (Kang, Kelly, Murray, Visbal, 2016; Whitehead, 2016; Winkelmes et al., 2015).
Effective task design supports learning by guiding students through the process—not just focusing on the final product. As Persky and Robinson (2017) note, learners develop expertise through the quality of the design and execution of the learning experience, not merely through participation. When instructors provide detailed guidance, clarify expectations, and break down complex assignments into manageable steps, students are more likely to feel confident in their ability to tackle the work. In short, transparent task design doesn't just help students understand what to do; it empowers them to believe they can do it, which is a foundational element of motivation and academic success.
How can scaffolding help me plan the steps students should take to complete the assignment?
Scaffolding in teaching and learning refers to the temporary support provided by an instructor, a more experienced peer, or another resource that enables students to engage meaningfully in tasks they might not yet be able to complete independently (Belland, 2013). Sharing the task involves breaking down complex assignments into manageable steps; approaching this from a scaffolding perspective means that the instructor is thoughtfully helping students to encounter new experiences in a useful order.
Scaffolding provides students with clear direction, reduces confusion, clarifies the purpose of the task, helps them stay focused, incorporates timely feedback, and guides them toward helpful resources (McKenzie, 1999). This concept aligns closely with Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, which emphasizes the learner’s ability to accomplish tasks with guidance that they couldn’t manage alone.
In Transparent Assignment Design, the “task” component functions as a form of scaffolding by offering students the clarity and structure they need to successfully complete an assignment or activity. By providing this support, scaffolding enhances the learning experience, promoting student autonomy, increasing engagement, and reducing frustration throughout the process.
Strategies for Communicating Tasks to Complete an Assignment
Strategies for Writing Your Purpose
Break Down the Assignment or Activity
- Divide the assignment into smaller, sequential steps.
- Clearly outline each phase of the assignment (e.g., research, drafting, revising).
- Use bullet points or numbered lists to show progression.
- Provide a timeline or checklist for each phase.
- Flag steps that previous students have taken that should not be part of the process so students don’t engage in unproductive work.
Articulate Clear, Action-Oriented Process
- Define key terms and academic language used in the assignment.
- Offer sentence starters or writing frames for complex tasks.
- Use Graphic Organizers to help students visualize the structure of their work (e.g., outlines, flowcharts).
- Communicate instructions both in writing and verbally.
- Consider video walkthroughs or annotated assignment sheets.
- Offer low-stakes opportunities to practice components of the task.
- Use the AI Assessment Scale to help clarify expectations around the use of AI tools in completing assignments.
Clarify the Task Section with Student Perspective in Mind
- Identify the first action students should take when they begin the assignment. Is this step clearly communicated?
- Ensure the task description helps students avoid unnecessary or inefficient steps that could waste time.
- Guide students to focus their efforts on producing high-quality work within the time available.
- Consider whether in-class practice or preparation activities would help students perform the task more effectively on the graded assignment.
Uncover Assumptions Through Peer or Student Review
- Ask a colleague from a different discipline or a student partner to walk through every step they would take to complete the assignment, from reading the instructions to submitting the final product. This exercise can reveal overlooked steps, uncover confusing instructions, and highlight both effective strategies and inefficient habits. Their feedback can help you refine the assignment to better support student understanding and success.
- Consider prompting a Generative AI tools (such as Magic To Do) to outline the steps involved in your assignment to see if it identifies steps you hadn’t thought of or that you specifically don’t want students to take.
Provide Students with Opportunities to Monitor and Reflect on their Process
Possibilities include:
- Specifying milestones where students submit parts of the assignment for feedback.
- Creating a checklist of required components (e.g., thesis statement, citations, formatting).
- Including opportunities for peer review or group brainstorming.
- Providing structured prompts for giving and receiving feedback.
- Offering formative feedback at each stage to guide improvement.
- Creating space for students to ask questions (e.g., discussion boards, office hours).
- Maintaining a FAQ section for recurring assignment-related queries.
Frequently Asked Questions
Developing Tasks in Transparent Assignment Design
(adapted from Winkelmes, Boye, and Tapp, 2019)
What should we do in order not to stifle students’ creativity in completing the assignments?
Research on desirable difficulty suggests that it promotes teaching decisions and leads to more effective learning experiences (Bjork, 1994; Nelson & Eliasz, 2023).
One way to do this is to make the process visible and to affirm students’ engagement in the process. If you find that this is the case for your assignment, consider using the language in the purpose statement that highlights engaging with the process and validates the students’ creative ways of identifying the process.
Here is example language for the purpose statement used by Transparency in Learning and Teaching PI Dr. Mary-Ann Winkelmes: “The purpose of this assignment is for you to struggle and feel confused while you invent your own process to address the problem.”
Is the Task section going to be too helpful to complete the assignment?
The research shows that students who are clear about the tasks to complete the tasks create higher quality work than anticipated by the instructors and the students met the teachers’ goals quickly, leaving time for more challenging work and greater achievement by the end of term (Kang, Kelly, Murray, Visbal, 2016; Whitehead, 2016; Winkelmes et al., 2015).